RE: Big 7.1 open items

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-17 09:38:29
Message-ID: EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJEEAKCCAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> >
> > So why all the enthusiasm for multi-tables-per-file?
>
> No idea. I thought Vadim mentioned it, but I am not sure anymore. I
> certainly like our current system.
>

Oops,I'm not so enthusiastic for multi_tables_per_file smgr.
I believe that Ross and I have taken a practical way that doesn't
break current file_per_table smgr.

However it seems very natural to take multi_tables_per_file
smgr into account when we consider TABLESPACE concept.
Because TABLESPACE is an encapsulation,it should have
a possibility to handle multi_tables_per_file smgr IMHO.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-17 09:38:53 RE: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-17 01:12:29 Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-17 13:02:44 Re: odbc patches
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-17 00:39:16 Re: Big 7.1 open items