| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq (Makefile) |
| Date: | 2000-10-21 00:12:58 |
| Message-ID: | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJAECDCKAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut
>
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Anyway, it seems like "override" does not work the way Peter is
> > expecting it to, at least not in my copy of gmake which I believe is
> > up-to-date. I seem to recall someone else complaining of this same
> > breakage a day or two back, as well.
> >
> > Is this a make bug, or a make documentation bug, or what?
>
> I'm convinced it's one of the two, but I haven't heard back from
> bug-make(at)gnu(dot)org, yet. In any case, the VPATH/CPPFLAGS patch that's
> coming up will stick an "override" in front of every C(PP)?FLAGS variable,
> which is the right thing to do anyway.
>
Hmm,is it sufficient ? For example,don't I have to change Makefile.custom
to use "override" ? I know now Makefile.custom isn't your recommendation
but how many people know it ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL | 2000-10-21 01:08:34 | pgsql/doc/src/sgml (client-auth.sgml installation.sgml) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL | 2000-10-20 23:57:35 | pgsql/src/makefiles (Makefile.solaris) |