On Oct 16, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> We cannot push 2.1 to 9.2 without changing the name of the packaging. If
> we just update to 2.1 on 9.2, then 2.0 users will be unhappy. Instead,
> we can bite the bullet and create something like
>
> postgis_20_92 (for 2.0)
> postgis_21_92 (for 2.1)
>
> so that they can be installed in parallel. Jeff/Craig, comments?
The naming seems fine to me and then we can have the new package name deprecate the old one.