Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-developmentHackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility
Date: 2012-12-05 07:28:12
Message-ID: EF8764FD-A4C5-47E5-87FF-BDB583CB26BA@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2012/12/05, at 14:46, Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Michael Paquier
>
> So I understand what you mean by the ordering might change, but this
> is actual output from the shell. I'm not sure how to convey that
> sentiment properly here and still have a real example. Perhaps just
> remove the example?
Yes, removing the example would be ok.

Does someone have another idea of example?

Thanks,
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2012-12-05 07:45:47 Re: review: Deparsing DDL command strings
Previous Message Phil Sorber 2012-12-05 05:46:37 Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility