Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot
Date: 2021-07-08 11:14:47
Message-ID: EE299384-1201-4791-B5D2-F49DDE97EF99@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Jul 2021, at 12:56, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Do you or others have any opinion on whether this should be
> back-patched? I personally prefer it to be a HEAD-only patch.

+1 for only applying this to HEAD. The restart_lsn debug elog has been there
since 2014 so there doesn’t seem to be any immediate rush.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-07-08 11:17:58 Re: A few assorted typos in comments
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-07-08 10:56:12 Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot