Re: transactoin id wraparound problem

From: <alex(dot)cotarlan(at)thomson(dot)com>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transactoin id wraparound problem
Date: 2006-09-06 19:29:25
Message-ID: ED5A90704BD7744380E00432EEE1652303803896@TFUSNYNYCMBX01.ERF.THOMSON.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

What exactly permissions are required to vacuum every table including
system catalogs ?

Thanks , -alex

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:41 AM
To: Sriram Dandapani
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transactoin id wraparound problem

"Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> writes:
> I get error messages on the console that says
> WARNING: database "xxx" must be vacuumed within 10094646 transactions

> I shutdown, restart pg and issue a vacuumdb -f <database>

The shutdown/restart was a waste of typing, and -f doesn't really help
here either.

> I still get messages saying database must be vacuumed and the
> transaction count keeps decreasing.

I'll bet a nickel you did not run the vacuum as superuser. It has to be
done by a superuser to have permission to vacuum every table in the
database (including system catalogs).

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-09-06 19:32:08 Re: transactoin id wraparound problem
Previous Message Sriram Dandapani 2006-09-06 19:23:01 Re: transactoin id wraparound problem