| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Use UNKNOWN with PL/Perl spi_prepare()? |
| Date: | 2010-04-07 00:28:28 |
| Message-ID: | ED310625-D03D-4631-9198-D119A55F8296@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It has been suggested in the past that we should have a full DBD interface in plperl, and indeed there was such an animal at one stage, although it was not compatibly licensed, and it is probably now way out of date.
>
> The current plperl interface back into the database is a *much* thinner veneer over SPI than a DBD interface would be. Someone could start a project for a DBD interface for plperl, but it would be a non-trivial amount of work, and it should probably not be done piecemeal.
That would be great, but my current need is far simpler than that.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-07 01:58:18 | Re: pending patch: Re: Streaming replication and pg_xlogfile_name() |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-04-07 00:27:48 | Re: Use UNKNOWN with PL/Perl spi_prepare()? |