| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Mike Rogers" <temp6453(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jean-Michel POURE" <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
| Subject: | Re: Ultimate DB Server |
| Date: | 2001-10-29 02:40:20 |
| Message-ID: | ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGOEFOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Doh! I messed up my example!
The first table was supposed to be transactional.
> I don't get how you can have different tables being transactional in your
> database??
>
> ie. What on earth does this do? (pseudo)
>
create table blah transactional;
> create table hum not_transactional;
>
> begin;
> insert into blah values (1);
> insert into hum values (2);
> rollback;
>
> ?????
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bpalmer | 2001-10-29 02:52:50 | Re: Ultimate DB Server |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-10-29 01:52:35 | Re: Ultimate DB Server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bpalmer | 2001-10-29 02:52:50 | Re: Ultimate DB Server |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-10-29 01:52:35 | Re: Ultimate DB Server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bpalmer | 2001-10-29 02:52:50 | Re: Ultimate DB Server |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-10-29 02:18:31 | Re: HISTORY file |