From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "James Buchanan" <jamesb(at)northnet(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: place for newbie postgresql hackers to work |
Date: | 2001-06-06 04:42:41 |
Message-ID: | ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGMEOICAAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I know this is a big ask, but once its done its done, and we can
> all get on
> with the job. Not trying to criticize anyone, this is not a flame! Just
> asking for a place for newbies to start hacking.
Why not start with Thomas Swan's earlier posting?:
> I just got bit by the identifier name is too long and will be truncated
> limitation in Postgresql.
>
> AFIAA there is a limit of 64 characters for identifiers (names of
> tables, sequences, indexes, etc...)
>
> I had just started to get in the habit of using serial data types until
> I made to tables with long names and the automatic sequence names that
> were generated conflicted, *ouch* ...
>
> Is there the possibility of a name conflict resolution during the table
> creation phase similar to "the name I want to assign is already taken,
> so I'll pick a different name..." on the serial data type?
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-06 04:51:56 | Re: Another pgindent gripe |
Previous Message | mlw | 2001-06-06 02:26:44 | Re: REPLACE INTO table a la mySQL |