Re: pg_sorttemp files

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_sorttemp files
Date: 2001-10-18 01:52:21
Message-ID: ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGKEDNCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

My guess is probably yes it's ok - just shut down the server before deleting
them!

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of D'Arcy J.M. Cain
> Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2001 3:46 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] pg_sorttemp files
>
>
> I have tons of old files with names like base/db/pg_sorttemp####.##. I
> assume that they are temporary sorting files but somehow they never got
> cleared out. Is it safe to delete these from a running system. The files
> are months old.
>
> --
> D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
> http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
> +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Studenmund 2001-10-18 01:59:24 Re: Package support for Postgres
Previous Message Mark Pritchard 2001-10-18 01:51:17 Re: PQstatus() detect change in connection...