| From: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: asynchronous commit&synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2024-08-10 13:03:21 |
| Message-ID: | ECD6BF67-E79F-495C-A981-3765A8EAEAF4@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 10 Aug 2024, at 17:25, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> So should we take in account sync replication in LR apply worker or not?
There was some relevant discussion of this topic on PGCon2020 Unconference [0].
My recollection is that it would be nice to have LR slot setting akin to synchronous_standby_names which describes what kind of durability guarantees should be met by streamed data.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2024-08-10 13:27:56 | Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-08-10 12:26:01 | Re: Constant Splitting/Refactoring |