Re: Article on Oracle & MySQL in E-week

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: wanderson(at)nac(dot)net
Cc: postgresql sql list <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Article on Oracle & MySQL in E-week
Date: 2005-10-25 02:55:17
Message-ID: EC8DF986-47E3-457F-96A3-3BB8B6B48C4E@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


On Oct 21, 2005, at 0:38 , Wendell Anderson wrote:

> You are quite incorrect in stating that MySQL can now claim
> "parity" with
> PostgreSQL through it's release of version 5.0.

Mr Anderson,

Who are you writing to? cegarry(at)yahoo.com? Are you referring to
this article?

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1876702,00.asp

I skimmed it, but didn't see any mention of PostgreSQL. Perhaps I
missed it, or perhaps you mean another article?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2005-10-25 03:08:37 Re: how to create rule as on delete
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2005-10-25 02:49:03 Re: SQL language