Re: [noreply@postgresql.org: coder]

> On Apr 4, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 06:24:25PM -0300, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>> David G. Johnston wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would +1 modding the emails coming in
>>>> through this channel. The volume is low
>>>> enough that it should not burden the mods.
>>>> And to help with any increase in volume,
>>>> I’m happy to help with the screening.
>>>
>>> I won't object to additional moderation but it doesn't seem warranted at
>>> this time. I too think that at least some of the issues are form
>>> presentation related and are on their way to being improved so things will
>>> probably improve, and they aren't particular bad right now.
>>
>> +1. I do object, kinda -- surely we have better uses of Jonathan's time
>> :-) We used to moderate doc comments, and it was a terrible system …

Thanks for the concern. If push comes to show, I find email moderation is an
O(1) operation, but yes could become O(n).

>
> Agreed. Let's first clarify the web page and see how much it fixes.

Please see attached screenshot in terms of the direction we're thinking.
Apologies for not having it as a diff, but the section of the code it lives in
would not produce an easy-to-read diff.

Jonathan