From: | T(dot)R(dot)Missner(at)Level3(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com, doug(at)wireboard(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: trigger compile problem |
Date: | 2001-09-26 05:25:45 |
Message-ID: | EBFCF3982143D511A77F0008C716807E0106DB31@N0400IDC1.oss.level3.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I certainly wouldn't.
I am wondering if somehow pgaccess left this out and I cut and paste d waht
pgaccess built. I'll check that in the morning.
The good news is my db absolutly screems now that I moved some processing
to
a trigger. No more reason to look at mysql which I was dreading.
thanks for all the good work Tom,
t.r. missner
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:23 PM
To: Missner, T. R.
Cc: Jan Wieck; doug(at)wireboard(dot)com; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trigger compile problem
T(dot)R(dot)Missner(at)Level3(dot)com writes:
> It was the ; after END
> I feel like a tard.
> spent over 5 hours on this .
I've always wondered why plpgsql is so nitpickingly insistent on finding
a semicolon after the last END. Would anyone object if I made the
last semi optional?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | T.R.Missner | 2001-09-26 05:30:03 | Re: trigger compile problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-09-26 05:23:18 | Re: trigger compile problem |