Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Date: 2010-01-15 17:43:22
Message-ID: EBFC3716-83CF-40B9-9109-A330D407176E@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 15, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

> But I'm still wondering why this isn't replication.

I was wondering the same thing. ISTM that the docs could reference third-party replication solutions, too (or a wiki page listing them, since they'll change often).

Anyway, I think Heikki's proposed chapter name covers it:

> High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication

Works for me.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-01-15 17:51:58 Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-15 17:37:57 Re: Streaming replication, loose ends