Re: Proposal for db level triggers

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for db level triggers
Date: 2008-03-21 05:42:08
Message-ID: EB824DFB-14C4-4094-9A21-C81796E16045@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mar 13, 2008, at 5:14 PM, James Mansion wrote:

> James Mansion wrote:
>> In usage:
>>
>> AFTER START clears counters and flags.
>> UPDATE triggers on data set counters and flags.
>> BEFORE COMMIT examines the counters and flags and performs any
>> final validation or
>> adjustments (or external events such as sending a MoM message)
>>
> I'd like to point out also that AFTER CONNECT is a good opportunity
> to CREATE TEMP TABLE (be
> nice if a global temp table definition could be persisted and
> automatically duplicated into each session, but
> never mind).

+1 on both counts. Can we get a TODO?
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2008-03-21 06:06:30 Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds]
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2008-03-21 04:09:25 Re: [PATCHES] Show INHERIT in \du