Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Date: 2023-10-24 20:25:54
Message-ID: EB443428-07A0-48BA-824C-2E6CD89BF9B9@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 13 Sep 2023, at 01:49, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> My patch increased user/sys time a bit (likely due to a higher number of
> futile psql forks), but Daniel's doesn't. And it does show a nice overall wall
> clock time saving.

I went ahead and applied this on master, thanks for review! Now to see if
there will be any noticeable difference in resource usage.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-24 20:34:54 Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-10-24 20:22:39 Re: Replace references to malloc() in libpq documentation with generic language