From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: operators and bit field |
Date: | 2003-02-14 23:23:11 |
Message-ID: | EB31KIIFNKVPSNSMSMFDZ522WLHLH1W.3e4d7a5f@cal-lab |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sorry,
'bit masks' === 'bit strings'
BTW, how are 'bit strings' stored and manipulated?
2/14/2003 2:29:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net> writes:
>> I haven't seen what operators can be applied to bit masks.
>> In particular, I am looking to use binary AND:
>> I want to AND two bitmasks together and see:
>> A/ if the result has ANY bits set
>> B/ what bits are set in the results.
>
>Why don't you use bit strings, like the SQL spec authors intended?
>
>regression=# select b'10001' & b'01111';
> ?column?
>----------
> 00001
>(1 row)
>
>See types BIT(n) and BIT VARYING(n).
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-02-14 23:31:43 | Re: pg_stat_user_tables |
Previous Message | Medi Montaseri | 2003-02-14 22:57:06 | pg_stat_user_tables |