From: | Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Broers <mbroers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: switching replication from standard asynch to slots |
Date: | 2016-12-12 06:41:36 |
Message-ID: | EA68DEB3-2807-4180-9B6C-3C7DF19C56EF@simply.name |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi.
> 9 дек. 2016 г., в 22:48, Mike Broers <mbroers(at)gmail(dot)com> написал(а):
>
> I have a few production environments that use vanilla streaming replication. (9.5 and 9.6)
>
> I'm curious if I can create the replication slot on the primary host, shutdown postgres on the secondary replica, update the recovery.conf to include the primary_slot_name, and restart postgres on the replica to effectively 'switch' over to use the slot for streaming without repriming with a fresh pg_basebackup.
>
> Also curious if I get into a pickle because of limits in pgsql_xlog disk space if I can just shut down the replica, remove the slot information, and do whatever cleanup is required on the primary and restart the replica with the slot information removed from the recovery.conf and go back to vanilla streaming replication without repriming.
>
> Anyone do this kind of slot/streaming switcheroo?
Yep, we have used both of described scenarios, they work. Note that in the second case you would probably need a valid restore_command in recovery.conf.
>
> Mike
>
>
--
May the force be with you…
https://simply.name
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ram DBA | 2016-12-12 23:35:56 | Frequent errors in postgresql.log |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-12-12 02:23:03 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Would like to below scenario is possible for getting page/block corruption |