| From: | Gary Doades <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and Linux 2.6 kernel. |
| Date: | 2004-04-04 08:52:40 |
| Message-ID: | EA46C097376A@gpdnet.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 3 Apr 2004 at 21:23, Mike Nolan wrote:
> > Almost any cross dbms migration shows a drop in performance. The engine
> > effectively trains developers and administrators in what works and what
> > doesn't. The initial migration thus compares a tuned to an untuned version.
>
> I think it is also possible that Microsoft has more programmers working
> on tuning issues for SQL Server than PostgreSQL has working on the
> whole project.
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
Agreed. Also considering the high price of SQLServer it is in their
interests to spend a lot of resources on tuning/performance to give it a
commercial edge over it rivals and in silly benchmark scores.
Cheers,
Gary.
> --
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.6.5 - Release Date: 31/03/2004
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gary Doades | 2004-04-04 08:56:34 | Re: PostgreSQL and Linux 2.6 kernel. |
| Previous Message | Gary Doades | 2004-04-04 08:49:23 | Re: PostgreSQL and Linux 2.6 kernel. |