Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Victor Sudakov <vas(at)sibptus(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability
Date: 2021-02-09 10:22:13
Message-ID: E9DEC4D3-66CA-4F67-9481-301B9B140124@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> 9 февр. 2021 г., в 15:12, Victor Sudakov <vas(at)sibptus(dot)ru> написал(а):
>
> I'm considering WAL-G now, not as a backup solution per se, but as an
> advanced WAL archiver which can:
Keep in mind that once upon a time you will have to delete WAL segments. If you just use wal-g delete you have to point our which backup to keep.

> 1. Upload/download WALs directly to S3
>
> 2. Verify WALs integrity (a very nice feature, but I think does not work
> if there are no backups)
If will not be alarmed if WALs before backup are missing. Though it should still analyze chains correctly.

> 3. Prevent WAL overwrite (does it work?)
I think so.

Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Sudakov 2021-02-09 11:07:52 Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability
Previous Message Victor Sudakov 2021-02-09 10:12:57 Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability