| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Luis Carril <luis(dot)carril(at)swarm64(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Option to dump foreign data in pg_dump | 
| Date: | 2019-07-15 10:06:37 | 
| Message-ID: | E9C5B25C-52E4-49EC-9958-69CD5BD14EDA@yesql.se | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
> On 12 Jul 2019, at 16:08, Luis Carril <luis(dot)carril(at)swarm64(dot)com> wrote:
> 
> > > On 28 Jun 2019, at 19:55, Luis Carril <luis(dot)carril(at)swarm64(dot)com> wrote:
> > > What about providing a list of FDW servers instead of an all or nothing option? In that way the user really has to do a conscious decision to dump the content of the foreign tables for > > a specific server, this would allow distinction if multiple FDW are being used in the same DB.
> 
> > I think this is a good option, the normal exclusion rules can then still apply
> > in case not everything from a specific server is of interest.
> 
> Hi, here  is a new patch to dump the data of foreign tables using pg_dump. 
Cool!  Please register this patch in the next commitfest to make sure it
doesn’t get lost on the way.  Feel free to mark me as reviewer when adding it.
> This time the user specifies for which foreign servers the data will be dumped, which helps in case of having a mix of writeable and non-writeable fdw in the database.
Looks good, and works as expected.
A few comments on the patch:
Documentation is missing, but you've waited with docs until the functionality
of the patch was fleshed out?
This allows for adding a blanket wildcard with "--include-foreign-data=“ which
includes every foreign server.  This seems to go against the gist of the patch,
to require an explicit opt-in per server.  Testing for an empty string should
do the trick.
+	case 11:				/* include foreign data */
+		simple_string_list_append(&foreign_servers_include_patterns, optarg);
+		break;
+
I don’t think expand_foreign_server_name_patterns should use strict_names, but
rather always consider failures to map as errors.
+	expand_foreign_server_name_patterns(fout, &foreign_servers_include_patterns,
+					    &foreign_servers_include_oids,
+					    strict_names);
This seems like a bit too ambiguous name, it would be good to indicate in the
name that it refers to a foreign server.
+ Oid serveroid; /* foreign server oid */
As coded there is no warning when asking for foreign data on a schema-only
dump, maybe something like could make usage clearer as this option is similar
in concept to data-only:
+     if (dopt.schemaOnly && foreign_servers_include_patterns.head != NULL)
+     {
+         pg_log_error("options -s/--schema-only and --include-foreign-data cannot be used together");
+         exit_nicely(1);
+     }
+
cheers ./daniel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2019-07-15 10:12:25 | Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays | 
| Previous Message | Paul Guo | 2019-07-15 08:52:14 | Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensure clean shutdown) |