From: | "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <grb(at)skogoglandskap(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need more IOPS? This should get you drooling... (5xnvme drives) |
Date: | 2015-06-04 11:23:50 |
Message-ID: | E934F29C-0127-48EE-8AEC-C9BADFD0CC64@skogoglandskap.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Images/data here
On 04 Jun 2015, at 13:07, Graeme Bell <grb(at)skogoglandskap(dot)no> wrote:
> I previously mentioned on the list that nvme drives are going to be a very big thing this year for DB performance.
>
> This video shows what happens if you get an 'enthusiast'-class motherboard and 5 of the 400GB intel 750 drives.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hE8Vg1qPSw
>
> Total transfer speed: 10.3 GB/second.
> Total IOPS: 2 million (!)
>
> + nice power loss protection (Intel)
> + lower latency too - about 20ms vs 100ms for SATA3 (http://www.anandtech.com/show/7843/testing-sata-express-with-asus/4)
> + substantially lower CPU use per I/O (http://www.anandtech.com/show/8104/intel-ssd-dc-p3700-review-the-pcie-ssd-transition-begins-with-nvme/5)
>
> You're probably wondering 'how much' though?
> $400 per drive! Peanuts.
>
> Assuming for the moment you're working in RAID0 or with tablespaces, and just want raw speed:
> $2400 total for 2 TB of storage, including a good quality motherboard, with 2 million battery backed IOPS and 10GB/second bulk transfers.
>
> These drives are going to utterly wreck the profit margins on high-end DB hardware.
>
> Graeme Bell
>
> p.s. No, I don't have shares in Intel, but maybe I should...
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dorian Hoxha | 2015-06-04 11:29:49 | Re: Need more IOPS? This should get you drooling... (5xnvme drives) |
Previous Message | Graeme B. Bell | 2015-06-04 11:07:39 | Need more IOPS? This should get you drooling... (5xnvme drives) |