Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA
Date: 2005-06-09 09:54:50
Message-ID: E81AA9D362FF028C1B3B77AA@sparkey.oopsware.intra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Donnerstag, Juni 09, 2005 10:33:08 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

>> One issue that comes to my mind is what to do when dealing with tables
>> that have assigned triggers and sequences (serials). Do we want to move
>> them as well or leave them in the source namespace?
>
> They should all be moved. Remember nasties like indexes should be moved
> as well as toast tables.

Oh, i thought toast tables should live in the pg_toast namespace?

--

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2005-06-09 10:03:45 Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-06-09 07:52:40 Strange transaction-id behaviour? (was Re: Two updates problem)