Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane PostgreSQL <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"
Date: 2022-08-26 23:12:08
Message-ID: E814ECF0-D08B-4EF6-AD3F-782212F2747F@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Aug 26, 2022, at 15:33, Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
> [...]

I'm still not clear on what you are proposing. Are you proposing a change to PostgreSQL to remove the "connamespace" column from the "pg_constraint" table, since it can be derived from other tables?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryn Llewellyn 2022-08-27 01:47:56 Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"
Previous Message Bryn Llewellyn 2022-08-26 22:33:02 Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"