| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption |
| Date: | 2005-12-19 10:51:25 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7EACC@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:kleptog(at)svana(dot)org]
> Sent: 19 December 2005 10:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tom Lane; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Peter Eisentraut;
> pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Andreas Pflug
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password
> encryption
>
> In that case, I agree. I've always thought a lot of problem in windows
> could be solved if they systematically added a version number to every
> library (like in UNIX).
>
> Are there any reasons why we shouldn't change the libname with every
> release like for UNIX? I can't think of any, but you never know...
Not that I can think of.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-19 11:37:30 | Re: Re: Which qsort is used |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-19 10:42:00 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption |