Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor
Date: 2005-12-01 15:49:14
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E5A6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 01 December 2005 15:29
> To: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: Marc Fournier; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
> > message. However I do see it in the online archives.
>
> > Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail
> was lost on its
> > way here?
>
> [ checks mail logs... ] Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php
>
> There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
> server move. I still haven't seen anything about Michael's
> ecpg commits
> of yesterday, either.

Mail from there probably comes from tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org now rather than
tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org from what Marc told me yesterday. I suspect
Majordomo needs to be told that.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-12-01 17:00:59 Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-01 15:28:34 Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor