From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas" <maps(dot)on(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Invisible tables in Access 2000 |
Date: | 2005-11-11 10:12:09 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF62@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas [mailto:maps(dot)on(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: 10 November 2005 18:02
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Invisible tables in Access 2000
>
> It must be related to the server version.
> The issue appears with PG 8.1 server but not with an 8.0.4
> that I just
> tunneld in via ssh.
> Finally I tried it with the 8.1 server of the windows binary running
> localy on my workstation but it won't show other schemas either.
Judging by the fact that there are 101 tables/views in a fresh 8.1
database, I suspect this might well be caused by the declare/fetch bug
which affects record sets larger than the cache size (which defaults to
100). On 8.0, the number of tables and views is lower, leaving room for
some of theuser objects to be returned.
Please try 08.01.0101 which I just uploaded to the ftp site.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miguel Juan | 2005-11-11 12:55:51 | psqlOdbc Ansi + BDE issues |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-11 09:04:59 | psqlODBC 08.01.0101 Released |