From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: automake |
Date: | 2005-11-10 16:10:51 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF3D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: automake
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> >>Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39
> >>To: Dave Page
> >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> >>Subject: Re: automake
> >>
> >>Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a
> >>missing separator
> >>in line 377.
> >>
> >>automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but
> >>aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will
> fail then.
> >>If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no?
> >
> >
> > Eh? Do you have both installed in different locations or something?
> No, /usr/bin.
> All versions are present, but ./bootstrap relies on
> aclocal/autoconf to
> point to the right versions.
>
> currently, aclocal-1.4 will run (without problem), but
> automake-1.9 will
> claim aclocal version and configure isn't created. aclocal-1.9 won't
> run, many errors.
Is this OK now (following an svn update)?
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-10 16:46:44 | Re: automake |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-10 16:00:25 | Re: [HACKERS] win32 8.1 pgadmin dll issues |