| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Open items list for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-09-28 07:33:10 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4CC2F34@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc
> G. Fournier
> Sent: 28 September 2005 00:50
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Neil Conway
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open items list for 8.1
>
>
> IMHO, changes like this *should not* have been allowed during
> beta, period
> ... even during feature freeze, it would have been questionable :(
Agreed. It's not like they weren't discussed to death prior to then as
well.
Whilst I'm not so wed to the changes to the others, pg_cancel_backend()
should certainly not be changed on whim - I know for a fact there are
people for whom this will cause problems.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ilia Kantor | 2005-09-28 08:12:53 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-09-28 06:10:01 | Re: Database file compatability |