From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Gevik babakhani" <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGDN and CVS |
Date: | 2005-09-21 13:01:50 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4CC2DCC@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gevik babakhani [mailto:gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl]
> Sent: 21 September 2005 13:57
> To: 'Magnus Hagander'; Dave Page; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] PGDN and CVS
>
> I have hacked with the current framework while ago. I almost
> know how things
> work. (Dave has been a great help for my questions...).
>
> My plan is to transfer the things I have created with drupal
> to the current
> framework also :)
>
> I was also thinking of letting everything in the site's
> database. Why would
> we want to export things and then re-import them back in the
> CVS? But then
> again this is just my opinion. The decisions are on the masters :)
Database is fine with me as an alternative to CVS, just as long as it
can be generated out into a static format for replication to the
front-end servers.
What I don't want is something completely separate that requires
significant effort to keep synced up, or to recover in the event of a
disaster.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-09-21 18:57:26 | Re: PGDN and CVS |
Previous Message | Gevik babakhani | 2005-09-21 12:57:15 | Re: PGDN and CVS |