Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...
Date: 2005-09-16 07:47:23
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4CC2C9B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Neil Conway
> Sent: 16 September 2005 06:38
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Wrap Up ...
>
> On Thu, 2005-15-09 at 22:06 -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> > One change that I would like to get into beta2 is the proposed
> > refactoring of some of the new system info / administration
> functions.
>
> Ok, this is done: the changes have been committed to CVS HEAD and the
> catalog version number has been bumped.

Hi Neil,

I appreciate that you want to get things done, but you realise that the
timeframe between your 'I'll commit this later post' and when you
actually committed was almost precisely when those of us that argued to
get these functions included in the first place were all asleep?

Perhaps you could allow 24 hours before committing potentially
controversial changes in future?

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-09-16 09:00:50 Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-09-16 07:40:00 Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...