Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2005-09-01 07:21:23
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9DBD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: 01 September 2005 03:31
> To: William ZHANG
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for 7.5 feature completion
>
>
> We currently have nmake files for the client libraries,

And even those are a royal pain to maintain, never mind an entire set.

Besides, I'm sure what William really wants is not nmake files, but VC++
Project files - but then which version do we keep? It's not like we
could say that everyone should be using VS2005, so all commits would
have to be VC++ 6.0 or earlier compatible, otherwise someone is bound to
complain.

I agree with Andrew though - maintaining VC++ project files or nmake
files is just not practical - especially given that most of our
developers are not Windows users.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-09-01 07:26:09 Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-09-01 06:37:40 Re: Pre-allocated free space for row