From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Date: | 2005-09-01 07:21:23 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9DBD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: 01 September 2005 03:31
> To: William ZHANG
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for 7.5 feature completion
>
>
> We currently have nmake files for the client libraries,
And even those are a royal pain to maintain, never mind an entire set.
Besides, I'm sure what William really wants is not nmake files, but VC++
Project files - but then which version do we keep? It's not like we
could say that everyone should be using VS2005, so all commits would
have to be VC++ 6.0 or earlier compatible, otherwise someone is bound to
complain.
I agree with Andrew though - maintaining VC++ project files or nmake
files is just not practical - especially given that most of our
developers are not Windows users.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-09-01 07:26:09 | Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-09-01 06:37:40 | Re: Pre-allocated free space for row |