From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "ennixo" <ennixo(at)free(dot)fr> |
Subject: | Re: RFC: roles |
Date: | 2005-08-01 18:53:16 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC96B2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 01 August 2005 17:52
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers; ennixo
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: roles
>
>
> This sounds like an undesirable stacking of trivial collections.
> Login Roles
> - dave
> - andreas
> - niko
> Organisational Roles
> - upport
> - nance
> - in
Yeah, you're probably right. Login Roles sounds OK, but I'm not overly
happy with Organisational Roles. Iirc, SQL Server calls them Logins and
Roles - do you know about other DBMSs?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | svn | 2005-08-09 18:01:37 | SVN Commit by andreas: r4387 - trunk/pgadmin3/docs/en_US |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-08-01 16:52:07 | Re: RFC: roles |