From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Anoop Kumar" <anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] SSL Support |
Date: | 2005-07-25 20:25:09 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC94E0@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anoop Kumar [mailto:anoopk(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com]
> Sent: 25 July 2005 06:51
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [ODBC] [Patch] SSL Support
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Waw! That's great. Actually, I was about to assign Sivakumar
> (who was a
> major contributor to the libpq enabled odbc project) to look into the
> SSL stuff, and so glad that you have already posted the patch
> for it.
Great, I'll apply it asap.
> I
> think now we can look into the odbc 3.0-3.5 compliance issues.
Any chance you can you look at some bugs first please?
- The threading issue
- Phillipe Lang's encoding issue
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-07/msg00131.php) I did
spend some time trying to solve this a while back, though I was quite
busy at the time. I didn't get very far :-(
- The blank varchar/text fields problem that a few people have seen with
some applications
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-07/msg00103.php
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-07-25 20:45:31 | Re: [Patch] SSL Support |
Previous Message | Joel Fradkin | 2005-07-25 20:01:08 | WHat do people think about using in production? |