From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
Date: | 2004-06-15 08:52:31 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4A961@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
> Sent: 15 June 2004 09:16
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [PATCHES] stderr & win32 admin check
>
> <snip>
>
>
> > Oh, and I notice the use of the PowerUsers group - iirc,
> there is no
> > such group on NT4 domains, so the attempt to get the SID will fail.
>
> That is one weird NT4.. :-)
>
> First of all, "Power Users" is not a domain group, it is a
> local group.
> It has nothing to do with your domain. As such, it will also
> work on non-domain-member servers/workstations.
>
> Second, the "Power Users" group have been included in the
> local groups since NT 3.1, IIRC (could be 3.5). It is most
> certainly there in NT4.
Ack, you know I wrote that very late last night :-p
You are of course correct that Power Users group is not a domain group.
Wasn't aware that it was there in NT4 though - probably 'cos when I used
to use NT4, it was on a small domain in which all servers were P/BDCs.
Which don't have a power users group...
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-15 13:27:32 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-06-15 08:16:02 | Re: stderr & win32 admin check |