From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DBSize backend integration |
Date: | 2005-06-24 19:58:09 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E71A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 24 June 2005 20:45
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DBSize backend integration
>
> > My personal view is that pg_database_size, pg_relation_size and
> > pg_tablespace_size, as well as pg_size_pretty should be included. If
> > others consider that the by name versions are also useful, then they
> > should be included, but renamed for consistency. The other three
> > functions should be dropped IMO.
>
> So drop total_relation_size(), relation_size_components(), and what
> else?
indexes_size()
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-24 20:06:39 | Re: DBSize backend integration |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-06-24 19:56:28 | Re: Server instrumentation patch |