Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-21 07:41:13
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E5C6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 21 June 2005 08:10
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Dave Page; Andrew Dunstan; Andreas Pflug; Magnus
> Hagander; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
>
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 00:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > > OK, new patch posted to -patches that updates all the
> utilities as well.
> >
>
> If I read the code correctly, the database name will be hardwired to
> "postgres" regardless of the default super user name correct?

Yes - that's intentional so that pgAdmin/phpPgAdmin et al. can
reasonably expect it to be there.

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-06-21 07:49:26 Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-06-21 07:09:56 Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb