From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
Date: | 2005-06-16 16:01:15 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E548@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 16 June 2005 15:14
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; Andrew Dunstan;
> swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au; postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at;
> alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl; pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us;
> pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum in the backend
>
> Dave,
>
> i wonder if we should aim to have pgAgent in the backend
> which was one
> of the reasons why I considered to have it converted from C++
> to pure C.
In previous discussions on -hackers when ppl raised the idea of
something like pgAgent being built into the backend, istm that the
majority of people were against the idea.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-06-16 16:02:25 | Re: PROPOSAL - User's exception in PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-16 16:00:41 | Re: [PATCHES] Escape handling in strings |