From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PWN |
Date: | 2005-05-24 07:29:41 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E039@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Fetter [mailto:david(at)fetter(dot)org]
> Sent: 24 May 2005 07:44
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Josh Berkus; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PWN
>
> Um, right. Is there something that shows me what they're supposed to
> look like? The script Josh gave me has a very, um, put-together look
> that I'd prefer not to have to reverse-engineer.
See the source of
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgweb/cvs/co.php/portal/template/en/
community/weeklynews/pwn20050128.html?r=1.1&p=1
For an example. Note that the comments in there need to remain exactly
as they are as they are really tags for the template parser thingy.
> Am I supposed to be checking them into CVS?
It would save me a job, but feel free to email them to me if you're not
comfortable with CVS.
BTW, does Josh's script not 'just work' without requiring reverse
engineering?
Cheers, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kendra L.Brown | 2005-05-24 07:45:34 | Adobe Photoshop 8.0 - very low price |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-05-24 06:44:00 | Re: PWN |