From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-13 07:44:21 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490DDF7@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: 12 May 2005 18:04
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Server instrumentation for 8.1
>
> Andreas,
>
> > First, as some other msg states the views will estimate the sizes,
> > dbsize uses actual file sizes. Second, in contrast to CKL,
> I would *not*
> > use these fancy new system views, because they mean yet another
> > dependency for pgAdmin.
>
> <grin> I like that. You're in favor of including the server
> tools because
> you, personally, use them. You're against including the new
> system views
> because you, personally, won't use them. Do I misunderstand
> you, or are you
> failing to put things in a broader context?
Saying he won't use them is not quite the same as arguing against their
inclusion for others who might.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-05-13 09:17:39 | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-13 06:08:56 | Re: Best way to scan on-disk bitmaps |