From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-05 20:49:24 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490DB9F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc
> G. Fournier
> Sent: 05 May 2005 21:08
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Tom Lane; Josh Berkus; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
>
>
> in fact, with how it looks like we'll end up extending it
> over time, there
> will also be a:
>
> jdbc-8.1.0.tar.gz
> odbc-8.1.0.tar.gz
> libpqxx-8.1.0.tar.gz
I don't believe that's a good idea. Speaking from an ODBC pov, not only
is the primary distribution for Windows, but the whole project is
version independent of PostgreSQL and follows it's own release cycles
entirely.
Commenting more broadly on the whole thread, I think that more tarballs
is a bad thing. I already get emails (both to webmaster and privately)
from people not understanding what to download - more files will only
make that worse.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-05 20:59:37 | Re: 'kitchen sink' downloads (Was: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-05-05 20:36:12 | Re: 'kitchen sink' downloads (Was: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement) |