| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgfoundry moved ... |
| Date: | 2005-04-28 19:40:22 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490DA03@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander
> Sent: 28 April 2005 18:13
> To: Gavin M. Roy; Josh Berkus
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pgfoundry moved ...
>
> I know Dave talked about
> comparing I/O
> on the main host vs the jails, not sure if he ever got
> through to doing
> it.
I ran Bonnie++ a few times and saw very variable performance. Both the
host and svr2 peaked about the same as I recall though.
As soon as we have another front end webserver, I do want to remove both
svr2 and borg from the rotation. Both are very overworked compared to
the other boxes.
Also, Magnus was say that the bt processes on svr4 are very sluggish.
Perhaps we should move them to ferengi as well.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-28 19:46:20 | Re: pgfoundry moved ... |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-04-28 19:36:24 | Re: pgfoundry moved ... |