From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Search machine is ready |
Date: | 2006-02-15 16:40:56 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4850858@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----Original Message-----
From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
Sent: Wed 2/15/2006 12:50 PM
To: Dave Page
Cc: Joshua D. Drake; Tom Lane; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Search machine is ready
> Dave, why don't you use the vendor packages? I believe Joshua will use
> Fedora Core, and I'd use vendor Apache, etc.
I was assuming Debian - I could have sworn he mentioned apt at some point.
wrt the vendor packages, I do try to use them whereever possible, with a couple of exceptions:
- PHP (and occasionally Apache) is often not built the way I want it - either being full of junk, or missing things. I installed PHP5.1 from FreeBSD ports the other day though, and it does seem much more modular there now - dunno if the same applies to FC/Debian et al these days.
- Vendor changes. I don't like to run packages I know to have been changed by the vendor - for example, it was noted the other day that the Debian PostgreSQL packages contains patches that aren't in PGDG releases. In this case the only OS vendor I would trust with a modified PostgreSQL is Red Hat, for fairly obvious reasons.
> As a part of WWW team and CMD, I'd be happy to coordinate the stuff,
> BTW.
Please feel free :-)
Regards,Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-02-15 17:05:25 | Re: Search machine is ready |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-02-15 12:50:39 | Re: Search machine is ready |