Re: svn access?"Can't connect to host

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "OpenMacNews" <OpenMacNews(at)speakeasy(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: svn access?"Can't connect to host
Date: 2005-05-06 18:40:57
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4850755@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

-----Original Message-----
From: OpenMacNews [mailto:OpenMacNews(at)speakeasy(dot)net]
Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 5:52 PM
To: Andreas Pflug
Cc: Dave Page; pgadmin-hackers
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] svn access?"Can't connect to host

> i'm wondering why this project has chosen the svnserve'd svn:// schema for the
> repo rather than web-dav + http://.

A number of reasons, but mainly because the Subversion manual's own comparison points out that it's much simpler to setup and faster to use. The only feature we might have used that we've lost out on this way is per-directory access control, but that's no great loss IMNSHO.

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch06.html#svn-ch-6-sect-1

> altho i'm not entirely clear, Andreas, are you tunneling the ra_svn client
> connect to the repo over SSH, perchance?

There's no need. Plain old svn has now been tested on various machines and works OK. Yours is the only failure I've heard of :-(

OK, just tried a telnet to the svn port (3690) from my machine here (at home), which is unknown to any of the firewalls where the dev box is - I get a response like:

( success ( 1 2 ( ANONYMOUS ) ( edit-pipeline ) ) )

What do you get?

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-05-06 18:44:11 Moving the translations
Previous Message svn 2005-05-06 17:12:51 SVN Commit by andreas: r4151 - trunk/pgadmin3/src