Re: performance hit for replication

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Nuzum
> Sent: 12 April 2005 17:25
> To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [PERFORM] performance hit for replication
>
> So, my question is this: My server currently works great,
> performance wise.
> I need to add fail-over capability, but I'm afraid that introducing a
> stressful task such as replication will hurt my server's
> performance. Is
> there any foundation to my fears? I don't need to replicate
> the archived log
> data because I can easily restore that in a separate step
> from the nightly
> backup if disaster occurs. Also, my database load is largely
> selects. My
> application works great with PostgreSQL 7.3 and 7.4, but I'm
> currently using
> 7.3.

If it's possible to upgrade to 8.0 then perhaps you could make use of
PITR and continuously ship log files to your standby machine.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/backup-online.html

I can't help further with this as I've yet to give it a go myself, but
others here may have tried it.

Regards, Dave.