From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Svr2 move to borg |
Date: | 2005-02-10 13:26:02 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528A86@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> Sent: 10 February 2005 13:17
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Svr2 move to borg
>
> On Thursday 10 February 2005 05:55, Dave Page wrote:
> > In related news, can advocacy.postgresql.org be laid to rest now?
> >
>
> I was going to write up that same email this morning. I was
> thinking that
> maybe we ought to preserve it someplace for historical
> reasons, but otherwise
> I think it is sufficiently crufty that we need to shut it
> down. IIRC the
> idea was to point advocacy.postgresql.org to
> www.postgresql.org/about/,
> though I wonder if we should have any requests to advocacy
> actualy bring up a
> static page explaining that the site has been laid to rest
> and with a pointer
> to the main website. This would allow us to have the static
> page translated
> into all the languages that were on advocacy, and provide pointers to
> whenever it might be best for those languages users to go.
> Any thoughts?
Sounds good to me. I assume it's all in CVS, so we will still have
everything?
On a similar note, what about the developer site? I know there is some
stuff deep-linked form the main site, but the actual formatted pages
have all been replaced now haven't they?
Regards Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-02-10 14:29:32 | Re: Svr2 move to borg |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-02-10 13:17:09 | Re: Svr2 move to borg |