From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ... |
Date: | 2005-01-31 22:32:14 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E45287DE@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 31 January 2005 22:24
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; David Fetter
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ...
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > /pub/src/v8.0.1 is missing :-(
>
> Why do we even have individual symlinks in pub/src? Seems to me we
> could replace the whole src directory with a symlink to source, and
> eliminate one bit of release bookkeeping ...
For some reason we have
/pub/source/vX.X.X/
And
/pub/src/X.X.X
Note the missing v on the second. I dunno why we have both - did some
bad URLs get advertised at some point? If that's the case, perhaps we
could get rid of one set now. All the v8 announcements pointed to the
websites ftp browser, so I doubt anyone is likely to miss one set of
symlinks.
Regards,Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-01-31 22:34:02 | Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-31 22:24:26 | Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ... |