From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on the mirroring system etc |
Date: | 2005-01-21 08:25:33 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528590@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
> Sent: 21 January 2005 08:24
> To: Dave Page; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Thoughts on the mirroring system etc
>
> No, I'd go for keeping them all independent. E.g. 2
> independent dynamic
> and 4 independent static. KISS principle, again. And it makes it very
> easy to add more static boxes if need be. Dynamic boxes are bit more
> work, since they need to get db tables set up etc.
Well they can't all be independent - the statics have to mirror from
somewhere.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-01-21 08:30:16 | Re: [DOCS] [BUGS] BUG #1414: DOC - pl/Perl hash tags |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-01-21 08:23:55 | Re: Thoughts on the mirroring system etc |