From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_config MSVC makefile |
Date: | 2005-01-07 17:10:09 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E452828D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 07 January 2005 17:07
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL)
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile
>
> Don't feel that it's on your head to keep them working. The project's
> attitude towards port-specific files has always been that it's the
> responsibility of the users of that port to keep 'em working.
> If there
> are no users of a port, it will suffer bit-rot, and eventually we'll
> decide to remove it. But I think it's a bit early to declare
> that there
> are no users of the MSVC or Borland ports.
OK, fair enough :-)
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-01-07 18:13:54 | Re: [pgsql-ru-general] Final call for translation updates |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-07 17:06:31 | Re: pg_config MSVC makefile |